Governance, audits, and controls

08 May 26

Why Complex Systems Need Independent Validation

At a pharmaceutical manufacturer with multi-country operations (names and details modified), the ERP transformation had become a standing agenda item in quarterly board meetings

29 Apr 26

The Board’s Blind Spot in ERP Programs

At a pharmaceutical manufacturer with multi-country operations (names and details modified), the ERP transformation had become a standing agenda item in quarterly board meetings

20 Apr 26

Why Steering Committees See What They Are Shown

Steering committees are designed to provide oversight, direction, and control over SAP programmes. They review status, assess risks, and approve key decisions

17 Apr 26

SAP Programs and the Echo Chamber Problem

In many SAP programmes, alignment appears early and persists through execution. Programme teams, implementation partners, and internal stakeholders converge

15 Apr 26

Why Your Implementation Partner Cannot See the Whole System

Implementation partners are deeply embedded in SAP programmes. They design processes, configure systems, execute testing, and support delivery milestones

13 Apr 26

Why Fixing Issues During UAT Does Not Reduce Risk

In most SAP programmes, User Acceptance Testing is seen as the final opportunity to identify and resolve issues before go-live. Defects are logged

10 Apr 26

The Email Thread That Signals Deeper Structural Risk

In most SAP programmes, risk does not announce itself through formal escalation. It appears in email threads. A clarification request between functions

06 Apr 26

Why Happy-Path Testing Fails Real Operations

In most SAP programmes, testing is designed around predictability. Scenarios are defined, inputs are controlled, and expected outcomes are clearly documented

01 Apr 26

The Difference Between SAP Completion and Business Readiness

In most SAP programmes, completion is defined with clarity. Configuration is finished, testing cycles are closed, defects are resolved within tolerance

30 Mar 26

Why Testing Success Does Not Reassure Leadership

In most SAP programmes, testing success is presented as a definitive milestone. Cycles are completed, defect counts are reduced, and sign-offs are secured across modules

Why Complex Systems Need Independent Validation

The Board’s Blind Spot in ERP Programs

Why Steering Committees See What They Are Shown

SAP Programs and the Echo Chamber Problem

Why Your Implementation Partner Cannot See the Whole System

Why Fixing Issues During UAT Does Not Reduce Risk

The Email Thread That Signals Deeper Structural Risk

Why Happy-Path Testing Fails Real Operations

The Difference Between SAP Completion and Business Readiness

Why Testing Success Does Not Reassure Leadership

Primary navigation

Services

Legal

Stay connected

Archives

Categories